Comments on: Java Challenge – The Mysterious Method Wrapper http://martin.ankerl.com/2009/04/16/java-challenge-the-mysterious-method-wrapper/ No movement is faster than no movement Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:00:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Martin Ankerl http://martin.ankerl.com/2009/04/16/java-challenge-the-mysterious-method-wrapper/comment-page-1/#comment-5823 Martin Ankerl Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:29:53 +0000 http://martin.ankerl.com/?p=209#comment-5823 You are right, your solution is simpler. Using the proc object is probably a bit more flexible, but I have no idea if I ever need that flexibility :) You are right, your solution is simpler. Using the proc object is probably a bit more flexible, but I have no idea if I ever need that flexibility :)

]]> By: Sven Helmberger http://martin.ankerl.com/2009/04/16/java-challenge-the-mysterious-method-wrapper/comment-page-1/#comment-5822 Sven Helmberger Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:50:53 +0000 http://martin.ankerl.com/?p=209#comment-5822 I wasn't so sure about the purpose of having each callable be wrapped in a Proc -- seemed like just using the returns values was much simpler (two classes less ;) but providing the same abilities. I wasn’t so sure about the purpose of having each callable be wrapped in a Proc — seemed like just using the returns values was much simpler (two classes less ;) but providing the same abilities.

]]> By: Martin Ankerl http://martin.ankerl.com/2009/04/16/java-challenge-the-mysterious-method-wrapper/comment-page-1/#comment-5821 Martin Ankerl Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:05:03 +0000 http://martin.ankerl.com/?p=209#comment-5821 Here is my solution: <a href="http://gist.github.com/97038" rel="nofollow">http://gist.github.com/97038</a> Here is my solution: http://gist.github.com/97038

]]> By: Sven Helmberger http://martin.ankerl.com/2009/04/16/java-challenge-the-mysterious-method-wrapper/comment-page-1/#comment-5819 Sven Helmberger Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:02:48 +0000 http://martin.ankerl.com/?p=209#comment-5819 I took some liberties with the implementation because you wanted it simple. http://snipt.org/TL I took some liberties with the implementation because you wanted it simple.

http://snipt.org/TL

]]>